InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 4696
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2006

Re: Lugheads1957 post# 186469

Tuesday, 11/17/2009 4:04:38 PM

Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:04:38 PM

Post# of 361695
Yes, but, if my memory serves me, the board kept suggesting the reverse split, and the company specifically rejected it at the time. Which is why I didn't take it into account. I do remember that the company rejected it, just not exactly the time frame. I know there's been major discussions on that issue here, and I would really hate to see such a thing.

As for the rest, it isn't my scenario, it's management's. Which is the only point I was making. He/she seemed to think that the board had thought up all the possibilities on it's own, whereas, what I see, overall, is that we are trying to interpret what the management has been telling us is going to happen, given the facts as they arise. If they want us to focus on something else that they consider real, then they need to tell us WHAT they consider to be real. Right now they are just saying forget what we told you we are going to do, but not replacing it with their new plans, or at least their actions are not telling the same story as their words are.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ERHE News