InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 763
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2008

Re: None

Thursday, 11/12/2009 12:18:46 PM

Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:18:46 PM

Post# of 4953
Patents have nothing to do with logic. A person can get a patent for anything as long as it doesn’t claim perpetual motion. People have even gotten patents that were already patented by someone else and if it goes unchallenged then success for obtaining a patent.

Obtaining a patent does not mean the object works. There have been many patents on things that ultimately didn’t work but showed good intentions and there have been patents on things that closely resembled other people’s patents that worked or not.

The important thing about patents is that a person gets one for something of use, beneficial and hopefully one that includes making money if you are the owner or an investor.

Most savvy investors are all too familiar with patents that proved successful and those that didn’t as indicated in the bottom line. Having or getting a patent issued does not mean it will fire up a savvy long investor and therefore provide a run on the stock. I’d venture to say it might inspire a short run.

GBRC needs sales of the device conforming to performance in the claims originally made to the investors when they invested in the company. A patent is just gravy on top of that.

The vision must be followed by the venture. It is not enough to stare up the steps - we must step up the stairs.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.