InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 335
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2003

Re: alj14 post# 10439

Thursday, 10/21/2004 10:04:00 AM

Thursday, October 21, 2004 10:04:00 AM

Post# of 341724
Hey, I don't really care if you believe me or not, those are the facts regardless.

As to CD's we have, you of course being in the know are aware that the negotiated deals for these fall far below the .05c per CD often quoted. Ultimately with the advertizing angle Sunncomm has and some other creative items, I think we can achieve at least .05 per CD if not more. However at the present time we are not receiving the sort of revenue that would make anyone except you, less nervous about survival.

I also am not saying Macovision is a better choice, simply that big companies pay attention to whom they are getting in bed with and that Macrovisions cash position, like it or not, is a competitive advantage for them both in terms of conducting R&D as well as in presumed staying power in a market.

I KNOW (caps again) you want your Koolaid dreams to be true, but dreams are not the same as reality.

AND THANKS FOR THE INSINUATION THAT I AM A MVSN SHAREHOLDER HOWEVER I HAVE ALREADY ANSWERED THAT CHARGE SEVERAL TIMES TO THE NEGATIVE.

Of course anyone who spouts anything besides the party line is suspect, demeaned and derided by this open minded group.

Btw I love your reasoning on this comment:

"Given the total failure, so far, of MVSN on the CD side, and the similarity between the technologies needed to protect CDs and DVDs"

Failure? You are aware that Marovision protects every DVD made aren't you, or are you in denial on this as well??

Yeah, Sunncomm is just kicking it, that's why it's .065 cents and Macrovision is $25.