Ohmymookies,
I'm afraid that I am not authorized to reply to private messages.
I asked for examples of companies that were assigned the skull and crossbones merely because they changed their names. This is what you sent.
"BCND, as an example. They changed their name and reduced their authorized.
------------
Email from the prior President of BCND:
Thank you for your email about Pink Sheets. I am aware of the situation and can say that I am not too pleased about Pink Sheets' new policy to place every company as Caveat Emptor if they change their symbol................(etc.)"
First, this was a symbol change, not a name change.
Second, it's telling that the prior President of the company was able to convince you that Pink Sheets had a "policy to place every company as Caveat Emptor if they change their symbol".
Third, As best I can tell BCND hasn't filed a financial report since 2003.
Perhaps you have another, more appropriate example?
