Not long ago, those of us more objective minded posters were accused of attempting to tarnish this company. We were also accused of obsessing over a failed relationship.
Did I misread the Terms of service? Is only one point of view allowed on this board. Didn`t they already try that and got the boot?
While we speak of failed company objectives as borne out by company press releases and SEC filings, they assert that their cousins, neighbors, friends in church choirs, and all other sorts of anonymous sources, are privy to much better information. Infomation that historically never seems to be able to make it on to the books.
So we`re tarnishing the company by pointing out their failure to meet their stated goals or objectives?
So we`re obsessing by offering a point of view that is documented in company press releases and SEC filings?
And now we`re "bad mouthing" them because we won`t drink their Kool-ade. Kool-ade from anonymous sources mind you. Kool-ade that in the past has over and over turned out to be nothing more than colored water.
Like you, I could care less where they get their information or what they consider to be DD. It`s their money and they have a perfect right to spend it any way they please. Put it in a sock and bury it next to that bush in the back yard that speaks to them for all I care. But don`t come on a public message board espousing anonymous undocumented sources of information and expect to not be challenged. That is not bad mouthing. That is honest objectivity by investors seeking truth and reality.
Thin
AI
