hey lakers,
about a year ago, when my business partner was still emailing Art, we approached Berger & Montague ( www.bergermontague.com ) about our options for going after JH Darby and Capital Growth and the brokerages.
Three partners at B&M looked over BCIT, the settlement with JHD/CGF, and the situation at hand.
Berger and Montague told us the Statute of Limitations had passed for shareholder litigation. They asked us why Megas settled in the first place. They also wanted to know why Megas was not legally going after the individual brokerages.
I'm curious why Attaway, who has flopped badly in the past with his allegations of DTCC fraud, all of a sudden is being mentioned by posters here as proceeding with litigation against anyone short?
Why does Attaway think the SOL is still active? Why is Attaway even dealing with shareholders, who sadly are bound under the arbitration rule with their individual brokers?
Oh, as for some of your other postings. Megas did not spend $800,000 in legal fees "fighting" this. He has very little legal bills after issuing himself access to millions of shares at the last known closing price of .0489 per share.
Funny how some of the posters here claim Megas spent $800,000 but he couldn't pay Stew in cash, he had to give Stew an ungodly share issuance package. That's only useful if you dumped offshore and needed a way to later cover.
