InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 15456
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/30/2001

Re: fastpathguru post# 84773

Thursday, 11/05/2009 6:28:27 PM

Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:28:27 PM

Post# of 151692
And yet, Dell was looking at bringing AMD in throughout 2002-2006, and the only reason they didn't was because Intel paid them not to.

So the cherry picked emails seem to say but fortunately Intel will be able to ask Dell under oath if that was the case.

HP themselves were bullied into keeping AMD at 5% MSS and as far away from business sales as possible

That's the story the cherry picked emails seem to imply but why not ask HP? I don't think you're going to like what the say.

AMD was not just superior price-wise during 2002-2006, but technically as well.

Not true at all. They did have a technical lead at one point but certainly not for 4 years. Another thing that would never occur to you is that having a superior datasheet doesn't mean you can supply your product reliably, on time and in the volumes required by your customers. Customers don't buy datasheets, only AMD pumpers and clueless bureaucrats do.

Eventually you'll have to face the fact that the judge or jury is going to hear the whole story, not just the cut & paste case contrived by the accusers and so eagerly embraced by you.




Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News