Mea culpa.
Suggesting that a poster was rapidly becoming a Scary Mofo wasn't the proper way to get the gentleman's attention. However, after 8 hours of patiently explaining a relatively simple SEC filing issue in an effort to educate him, only to be met with his contention that I was "in a corner" and "wrong" I became, as any reasonable person might expect, frustrated.
I believe that a full reading of the thread would result in any objective person concluding that my characterization was accurate........it would also reveal that others commented on both my patience and the other posters ad nauseum refusal to accept the proper interpretation of the SEC rules.
For the record, my use of the term Scary Mofo wasn't something that just popped into my head as a handy pejorative. The initials SM represent the initials of the company's COO and had been referenced previously........my fellow poster had shown that he was unaware of the meaning of the initials in my previous post and an edited version of my statement was:
"Please be advised that MM no more meant market maker than SM meant Scary Mofo, the latter of which is something you are rapidly becoming."
I thought it was clever. Guess there's no room for that, huh?
