LOL..waiting???..to confirm I corresponded with "SEN Burns"..keep waiting.
Let me help you...there is no Sen Burns on the SFC and I have never talked to a "Sen Burns" nor stated that I have...what I said was I talked to "Burns"..as in Kyle Burns..you know, the one in charge of handling this for the SFC??
..and yes, I corresponded directly..as direct as direct can be...and he stated they have forwarded all this to the SEC/DTCC..in his words "the proper authorities"..to let the "agencies with jurisdiction decide", and it is "up to the experts at those institutions"
In other words..it's up to the SEC/DTCC, and the SFC is OKAY with that based on all the facts..which is what I've said all along..and I'm sure others knew this also....
..and no, I will not provide links or anything else..you can correspond with Burns yourself to verify.
Here's a better question to "wait" for..why are funds being solicited to revive a "dead horse"...as this will never trade...and the focus is in the wrong direction.
There is only one way any litigation will do any good..that is to go after the source of problems...Megas and associates.
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. **Soren kierkegaard
