mcd2dinga stated: "I have to say that, IMO, I do agree with other posters that you have gone from seeing all positives with BOCX to seeing all negatives. You do develop theories which you present as the only possible explanation. Lately, they always emphasize the nagative.
That's just how I see it."
Again, I will relate my thoughts on RECAF. Back in 2007 I began communicating with Moro and my posting was influenced by what he said. I had positive prospects for RECAF but still held a small number of shares at that time. When I discovered Abbott was presenting at the 2007 ISOBM, I made substantial purchases thinking Abbott would proceed. It was a gamble and I lost. I have no one to blame for that but myself.
After Abbott ceased working on RECAF, I quickly decided to see how many others actually thought universal cancer markers had any merit and if that was the reason for the Abbott amendment. It was that point that I discovered that two other universal markers had gone exactly nowhere in the market place. I was still hoping for the best but when the stock plunged, I sold.
From the point of the Abbott amendment and the stock price plunge, I have found nothing positive on RECAF or a universal marker. That is just a fact.
AI
