InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,995.54
(
0.38%
)
US TECH 100
20,562.00
(
0.10%
)
Dow Jones
43,988.99
(
0.59%
)
Brent Oil
73.50
(
-0.28%
)
Bitcoin
81,559.24
(
1.34%
)
Post# of 42999
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

clipso

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 808
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2008

clipso

Re: zequalsz post# 11295

Thursday, 10/22/2009 9:19:53 AM

Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:19:53 AM

Post# of 42999
its very evident ...

that your wording below is not much different the standard caveats that eegc, and ALL other compannies issue with regard to forward looking statements(could, would, should, may, might, etc).....

so, youre not much different than malcolm, yes???

quote from post # 11295

"The SEC is being asked to approve a share issue to raise funds to be largely applied to drilling on an SEL which has ceased to exist since the Prospectus was submitted. This COULD well be causing them some puzzlement."

so is this intended to ignite fear and doubt...


JMO
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up