Can anyone come up with a scenario in which the SEC finds evidence of a massive naked short position and yet does nothing?
Because I really cannot believe that the SEC wouldn't have seen it if it was there. And if it isn't there, then doesn't that suggest SPNG might in fact have a very high O/S? And doesn't it raise a lot of other questions about the stories being told?
So, under what circumstances would SEC see evidence of a massive naked short position and do nothing?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.