InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1627
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2006

Re: mretgnol post# 125846

Wednesday, 10/21/2009 11:09:21 AM

Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:09:21 AM

Post# of 159752
Right, they saw what appeared to be an illegal short position mysteriously covered to the tune of 240 million shares. Why would the DTCC not expect otherwise on the rest? Do you see any other lawsuits against supposed short sellers by Megas? says MrE

uh, Mr E, this is falacious logic...

the DTC didn't see anything mysterious here.

this is one of the long term arguments of the naysayers..

there is a legal provision (references provided recently here) that allows shares to be issued in conjunction with court orders. there was nothing mysterious done.

the Brokers who got those shares were presented with the counterfeit certs/shares which you said was a civil issue remember?

you claimed that FINRA and the NYSE had no responsibiltiy and that ordering them to buy-in those shares was not reasonable.. i disagree. that buy-in would have been apropriate justice...








Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.