Question. (Not that you will answer, because you never will admit you ARE wrong). Do you believe that dermatologists do more harm than good? Do think that recaf has no value in aiding the pharmaceutical companies in determining whether they have irradicated cancer? Do you not see the possibilities of someone that HAD cancer and went thru treatment and needs to know if the cancer has returned? How do you know that the next time it has not metastasized somewhere else? Isn't it more likely that you can miss many cancers if you are spoecific to a particular kind of cancer. If the check engine light comes on do you not put the car thru a series of diagnostic tests. Do you value your automobile more than your life? It seems that you are implying this. What do you consider slow?
I have a serious question. Have you not ever heard os and so just died. They were told only a WEEK ago they have cancer. I have unfortunately been thru this exact scenario a few times. What if they were diagnosed early and went thru treatment? What would have been the outcome? I can not think you are serious when you do not believe in early treatment. I'm sorry. I don't know how you can defend that position. I just don't. Recaf IS the answer and will change medicine. I am obviously very passionate about this. You can make the argument that George Burns, or Milton Bearle, or Bobe hope live to a hundred years old. Yet they drank hard liquor and smoked every day. They are the exception. There are always exceptions, but as a general rule you or I may not be so lucky. I just don't see why anyone would want to suffer thru cancer. Just the word is associated with death. I don't expect you to ever admit that you are in agreement. Maybe you are one of those lucky individuals, maybe you are not. Be ready to sign a release statement that will absolve your doctor from any lawsuit that may arise from your defiance to take a recaf test
