InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,995.54
(
0.38%
)
US TECH 100
20,561.60
(
0.10%
)
Dow Jones
43,988.99
(
0.59%
)
Brent Oil
73.89
(
-2.09%
)
Bitcoin
76,538.95
(
0.84%
)
Post# of 35337
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

dread50above

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 4119
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2004

dread50above

Re: allnumbers post# 17410

Saturday, 10/17/2009 4:48:28 PM

Saturday, October 17, 2009 4:48:28 PM

Post# of 35337
"I know that others have said the same when clerks were contacted in the shipping / receiving and other departments."

Where did you get that from!?! That was never a part of my comment, allnumbers. Check the record.


At that time, I had spoken directly with Investor Relations. Huge difference between getting information from people charged with accurate dissemination of information and "clerks...in shipping / receiving"! Within days there after, Investor Relations was in 'lock down' on providing any more info.

That's why I feel quite confident the CVJ was not in the prototype at that time. Investor Relations had NO REASON to cover Torvec for leading shareholders astray.



"Don't confuse activity with results" - Crilly

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up