InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 265
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/22/2004

Re: rupert post# 45489

Saturday, 10/09/2004 2:03:16 PM

Saturday, October 09, 2004 2:03:16 PM

Post# of 97827
The 4 points in the last post were the ones that would be interesting to me to hear your thoughts on. I will list them here again:

- A broad numerical range != precision
- Your snide implication that not providing more precision than is possible means guidance is a "wish" is just FUD
- AMD was specific about what they meant by CPG Q4 seasonality, in contrast to your claim
- The analysts you cite in that one reuters report have either a poor recent track record with AMD, or a clear bias toward Intel, calling into question their spin regarding AMD's Q4 guidance.


I would say that (1) is obviously true, (2) seems a bit personal. did you really say that you think AMD's guidance is a "wish"? That would be unfair, to my thinking.

How about (3) and (4)? Those seem to be things that are straightforward to confirm or rebut.

Yuri/conductor
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News