InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 411
Posts 29528
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/25/2006

Re: peewee post# 463

Monday, 10/12/2009 9:48:47 PM

Monday, October 12, 2009 9:48:47 PM

Post# of 1839
Here's one opinion from Yahoo message board.

There are lots of ways of valuing NEP. Here's one:

1. 2010 revenue based solely on existing leases @ $70 oil = $70 million. .30 margin = $21 million earnings. $21 million divided by 31 million shares = $.68 per share from oil earnings on current leases.

2. Drilling earnings: 220 wells at $330 thousand per well = $72 million in revenue. $72 million X .30 margins = $21 million earnings. $21 million divided by 31 million shares = $.68 per share from earnings on drilling operation.

3. New leases on land containing about the same amount of oil as current leases. At least $.25 per share and increasing rapidly as the wells come on line year after year.

Total earnings in 2010: .68 + .68 + .25 (and increasing rapidly after 2010) = $1.61.

The above might be a bit too high or a bit too low, but it is certainly in the ballpark as far as I can figure.

Is a market price of $4.60 too high or too low for a stock that will earn in the neighborhood of $1.61 per share in 2010?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.