Sorry, but this nonsense that people knew from the beginning what was going to happen to such a degree of certainty they would stake their life and their loved ones lives on it is complete crap. No one had such a degree of certainty, because even the IR was not transmitting such information about the BEHL company and it existing forward from that point. In fact at no point has the company stepped in to clarify anything about #3, and the exact wording being used from people talking directly to company representatives has been an empty shell in hopes that another company takes it over. You got a new piece of information to help support your conclusion, but do not act like your confidence level was always there because you would not bet such high stakes on the limited information you had before.
It maybe great news, but I will take the same approach, I do not care who the source of the new information was from, until they print it in an official format for public dissemination it is just nice to know information, nothing to bet the “farm” on. I have my position and it based upon known public information, and I bet you wonder why be so anal about where the information comes from? Because public information is the only legal information that protects you as a stockholder, the rest of it is hearsay.
The idea of a split was based upon worthless shares held in a shell and your only equity being the 10th of shares held in an actively trading company. This is what the company presented, this is not what shareholders made up in their mind. So do not bash your fellow shareholders over something the company caused, direct your cynicism towards the company since it feels a word of mouth campaign is such a great medium to transmit such crucial information for clarification to its shareholders.
