InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 3335
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/23/2005

Re: janice shell post# 124538

Wednesday, 10/07/2009 2:13:37 AM

Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:13:37 AM

Post# of 159752
I wonder too who wrote that?....another third party PR??..like the last one?...that Megas claimed was "unauthorized".

Also...seems whoever wrote this did not learn anything from the last "Megas" letter to Burns/SFC.
Diss'ing Burns and the SFC is one thing, but diss'ing the SEC/DTCC in public is another. Seems the author does not realize Megas NEEDS the SEC and DTCC to approve and accept what is IN the filings, assuming Megas does file.

According to an email I just recieved from Burns..that is the position the SFC takes also...Megas must respond and file..and the SEC/DTCC will determine if they accept Megas's filings and let BCIT trade. The SFC is not siding or pushing for the SEC/DTCC to make a decision in favor of BCIT..that is the SEC/DTCC's business and they are the "professionals" in this matter as Burns put it.

I'm guessing today's PR just lowered Megas's chances somewhere below a snowballs chance in hades.

There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. **Soren kierkegaard

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.