Odd thing is, there are people out there that will invest money into a joint business venture or simply request a corporate bond. You fail to understand that an single investor does not have to have immediate returns and can specify the terms of an agreement for years to come. It may be highly risky for someone to do this on an organization that has yet to clearly post sales and revenue, but we all know that has happened in the past with other start up companies. Dismissing that it cannot happen would be setting yourself up for failure, as it is clear that this company does have certain ties with larger organizations that are clearly promoting this as the best answer to sustaining energy and food into the future. I surely do not base any decision making on such a notion as I have stated there is nothing to support it ever happening just as much as you cannot say with absolute conviction anything to the contrary of what is posted by the company currently as far as capitalization and rate of burn.
The PPS declining does not support your claim that this is a scam, that does not lend support to your poor assumption that this company is fleecing investors. It has no actual facts to support your conclusion, it is an assumption based upon an observation of only one factor which has way too many variables to influence it. The fact is the greatest contributor to the PPS problem as it has been stated many times over is that the company has failed in communicating with its current investors and potential investors with clarity on many subjects with past PRs. That can be easily correlated since all recent declines since the 21st of September have happened after the release of each PR. Your assumption however if it were true would result in complete sell off if there were any supporting factors to such an assumption.
