I know it didn't say anything about Recaf positive readings in the PR, since the PR was trying to only highlight the "good".
If the Recaf came back positive, wouldn't the Dr. have liability to let the patient know and then try to find cancer somewhere?
Half, you are not answering my question. HOW IS THE LATEST PR DIFFERENT FROM NEWS FROM SEVERAL YEARS AGO? This PR is just repackaged information, IMO. mcd
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.