InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 3535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2005

Re: mcd2inga post# 23061

Wednesday, 09/30/2009 2:49:37 PM

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:49:37 PM

Post# of 30387
MCD,

I re-wrote this one to correct a clerical mistake.


Now...You stated,"They assume the PSA, CEA, and CA-125 tests were wrong, since they are not that accurate anyway.

Now you are stating something very interesting,"they are not that accurate anyway"

These tests that you state are not accurate anyway are being used every day all over the world.

1. Does that make good sense to you?

Now Recaf can take away the false POSITIVES. Would this not be a good thing to atleast take away the false negs that Goldseeker is so upset about for tests that are approved and being administered to millions of people?

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.