Just want to mention CCGY
already had the same problem GU did. GU had to shut down diesel production in that province. So did CCGY. The only difference is that CCGY isn't a one trick pony. If CCGY can't sell diesel they can sell dimer acid. If they can't sell dimer acid they can sell hot melt adhesive. If they can't sell hot melt adhesive they can sell ink. Etc, etc.
CCGY have the flexibility to take advantage of the biodiesel market but they are not captive to that market alone.
Another source of confusion out there is the disservice that LPIH IR perpetrated on LPIH shareholders. Sounds like the presentation regarding that company's financing was not well presented. I think a ripple effect from that snafu has resulted in some of the confusion regarding CCGY's financing. So a couple more points regarding that:
1.) CCGY's financing was not a convertible. It was straight equity with a warrant kicker.
2.) CCGY adopted EITF 07-5 in January. So they are treating the warrants as indexed, level 3, and recording the warrant liability on the balance sheet and the change in warrant liability on the income statement. All that is included in the Q's already.
Not sure what LPIH IR told those poor investors...but unless there is some non-cash interest associated with LPIH financing, I don't know how you can predict what the warrant liability is going to do in coming quarters. The non-cash interest charges you can predict to a point...the warrant liability you can't.
But, then again, I wasn't there for the presentation. And I haven't seen the presentation, either.
AI
