Solidus Communications Inc (SLDC)

[Chastain2]

Blockman, I think you hit the nail on the head. Apparently Timberline's PR saying that CM was not economically feasible had more to do with the feasibility of Timberline to raise the necessary capital to go forward with the project than with the viability of the project itself.

Now, more than a year later, and gold prices at historic highs, it seems that obtaining capital to mine one of the United States largest untapped sources for gold should be relatively easy.

To say that pulling millions of ounces of gold out of the ground at a lower percentage cost per ounce than a year ago and selling it on the open market is not a lucrative is almost as intelligent as posting unverifiable supposed documents from government officials or saying that a company with one of the largest gold holdings claims should have a price per share of pennies rather than dollars.

Based on the geological reports provided by Timberline, who would have no reason here to inflate the numbers, there is enough gold on the claims to support a stock price here at $65.00 after mining costs.

I don't know if the posters here are being paid, and frankly do not care. I know what I hold, and I am not letting go. I can see this long term becoming a NASDAQ or NYSE stock that will provide for a nice retirement holding. I am only feel sorry for those who allow a few who are probably paid to bash to scare them from a profitable stock holding, they are the ones who are truly being hurt by this.

Let me conclude by asking those who post on this board to not respond to the bashers, since it is my understanding that they are paid by the number of responses, as well as the fluctuation in price they are able to create. By responding it is my understanding it gives them a financial incentive to continue to post things, whether they are true and accurate or not, becoming more aggressive to earn a buck. It must be sad way to earn a living.