InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,634.58
(
0.03%
)
US TECH 100
18,943.20
(
0.07%
)
Dow Jones
41,606.18
(
-0.04%
)
Brent Oil
73.34
(
1.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,314.90
(
3.66%
)
Post# of 159753
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

janice shell

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2571
Posts 306663
Boards Moderated 29
Alias Born 04/12/2001

janice shell

Member Level

Re: Egor post# 122636

Monday, 09/07/2009 6:08:22 PM

Monday, September 07, 2009 6:08:22 PM

Post# of 159753
As usual you conveniently leave out they where TA for Megas long before this happened!!!

They weren't TA, they were the market makers who submitted the Form 211 for Megas. At the time, many of us pointed out that Uselton was a very poor choice.

Guess we were right. Makes ya wonder:

In its decision, the hearing panel found that Legacy and Uselton committed "egregious" violations of the short selling rules in connection with more than 2,000 transactions in 2004 and 2005.

http://www.finra.org/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2009/P119725
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up