Grifco Inc (GFCI)

[cyofish]

Don't you think if SEC had jurisdiction in this matter Jerry Swinford would have reported taken the matter to the SEC instead of filing a civil suit in a district court.

This is an excerpt from the SEC website, "What we do":

http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml

The laws and rules that govern the securities industry in the United States derive from a simple and straightforward concept: all investors, whether large institutions or private individuals, should have access to certain basic facts about an investment prior to buying it, and so long as they hold it. To achieve this, the SEC requires public companies to disclose meaningful financial and other information to the public. This provides a common pool of knowledge for all investors to use to judge for themselves whether to buy, sell, or hold a particular security. Only through the steady flow of timely, comprehensive, and accurate information can people make sound investment decisions.

To have a remote chance of being heard from the SEC you have to tell them what SEC regulations Grifco specifically violated. In another words if you want to catch a mouse, make noise like cheese. So it's not "they sold my IRA"..."they issued invalid proxy"....you should be complaining about Grifco's failure of making material disclosure which resulted in negatively impacting your financial well-being or Grifco repeatedly defrauded investors by making fictitious disclosure in a pump and dump scheme.

Univ. of Cincinatti school of Law has a good SEC reference website:

http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/index.html