Data443 Risk Mitigation Inc (ATDS): Post Unavailable Additional Informati...

graffito · 2009-08-31T19:27:35.0300000Z

"In other corporate updates, LDSR is an issuer with a partial beneficial rights to a $4 million dollar lawsuit against an Investorshub.Com entity for the various malicious, slanderous and misleading posts being made on their website, who with total disregard for International laws continue to broadcast various false and misleading information. We were advised that we can note the Defendant in default this week but the registrar of the court insisted that he will not do so because we have amended the claim and added parties. (Additional poster names, individuals and entities which we believe provide support to these posters were added to the complaint). That is the registrar's ruling; and he advises that the new amended claim be served on Investors Hub as well, again, before default judgment can be had. We believe that because this is a USA entity being sued in Canada who at first defended the claim and suddenly stopped and never showed up to court at the set date. The courts are affording the defendants a second chance, as this is a sizable claim with serious consequences. Even though the new amended claim makes no new allegations against this Investors Hub, the registrar will not take it under the rules, and requires service of the amended claim". " How come the public relations professionals who write these releases still have not learned that slander is the wrong word? ihub has said they are not under the jurisdiction of Canadian law so why should they be concerned with international law? Did the court registrar make this ruling or the magistrate? Did mina mar publish the actual ruling or do we have to rely on their spin? ihub said they did not defend the case and they only challenged jurisdiction which is NOT the same thing as defending the case. ihub also said somewhere that they notified the court they were abandoning the case. Why would they be expected show up to a hearing for a case they had legally abandoned? Those are pretty simple events for there to be such different versions. What are the serious consequences when the judgement is not enforceable? All in all just another empty batch of puffery.