[ Megas never stated anything about his net worth, that I know of.. ]
Way to twist that one. On several occasions, Megas said he was placing his $60 Million worth of real estate in Spain into the shell. Stated over the phone and in a couple of emails.
[ that he hasn't, yet, could be interpreted harmless ways, such as it wasn't worth it, or it's a delayed action, or it's still an option]
LMAO! It would not be worth getting the 240 million shares back that Tommy coughed up for pennies on the dollar based upon the last trade before the halt. Delayed action? Uhhh..did you read the settlement Tom made? Do you think Tom can go back years later and say "whoops..I was mislead into settling with Capital Growth...I want my shares back?". Again, Megas stated on a couple of occasions that "he received bad legal advice" and was going to legally see if he could get those shares back...which was just another line of BS to begin with.
[ Stewart is not Megas ]
Again, nice twist. You asked me about lies Tom has stated. Tom in the past stated his buddy Stewart was a straight shooter and good friend who had never done any wrong. Only, Stew was running a bogus bank scam, mysteriously was hanging with con artist like Lido, and now is involved with a group who defrauded a fund of close to $20 Million. Was it a momentary brain fart by Tom?
He lied point blank to a licensed attorney and BCIT shareholder from PA on two occasions [ and what were the two occasional lies? Lay it out.]
Tom stated he was rolling his real estate into the shell, he was not settling with Capital Growth at all, he would keep the shell back in compliance at all costs.....
We are talking to a major law firm come recommended to us by NASAA..... we are talking contingency. duh?
Duh..all the major law firms take cases on contingency including the one I mentioned. NASAA? Not exactly the rocket scientists you want
[ We are not his shareholders. ]
We're not? Who owns and controls the operations of the shell? Who is listed as CEO? Because if it's not Tom, then fug this crap of following Tom. BCIT is his shell, Tom does control the operations and business decisions, and we are shareholders of TOM's company.
[ Sorry, it's his company, his play, not ours. Our beef is with our certless feckless brokers, not Megas. ]
Oh..I get it now. It's Tom's company, just we are not his shareholders. By the way, I'm a valid shareholder until Tom legally proves TD Ameritrade does not have a valid master cert to guarantee my shares. Until then, it is heresay.
[My Senator was quite able to grasp the problem, just receiving a letter from me and the well organized web site as well as statements from Megas which in no way conflict with the overall situation. Apparently you think we shareholders have no grievance with our crooked market sufficient to contact our congresspeople? ]
I think I would rather hear it from the horses mouth than a bunch of parrots. I think a company willing to make public statements in writing goes a long way versus a CEO who gets very quiet when tough questions are asked.
[ repeat, Stewart is not Megas. Nor is Stewart likely to think the shareholder's cause is a problem for anybody
but the shareholders. Megas shows a lot more conscience toward us. Forget Stewart. That's not a welcome avenue for us
to enlist, imho]
I repeat. Stew is a major shareholder and a U.S. citizen. Let's see Stew step to the plate. After all, he's going to make a ton of money on a cover. And some of us know how much Stew loves working with Gov't Agencies. (That's my sarcasm)
Welcome Avenue? I bet Stew knows a good FBI agent who loves to investigate financial fraud.
