InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 2691
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/17/2007

Re: P K G post# 37829

Wednesday, 08/19/2009 10:47:41 AM

Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:47:41 AM

Post# of 86719
Why? To perform an exercise in redundancy. No thank you. Besides I promised that he wouldn't be bothered by other individuals claiming to have a vested interest in what he had to say, using up his time without compensation, and having little where with all to conduct a meaningful conversation, or for that matter be a productive part of the conversation.

Bottom line. CEO says they are good deals. Board approves them as good deals. Drinks' attorney approves them as good deals. Another attorney reviews them and they are good deals.

Dead horse. Waste of time. Business is running. Anything else is just a continual exercise in redundancy.