InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 4398
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/22/2009

Re: None

Tuesday, 08/18/2009 1:56:39 PM

Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:56:39 PM

Post# of 103302
ok got a little more info on the court cases...

That was in fact the state court i linked to.

The federal case as far as I can tell exists because Laidlaw argues that in order to be in compliance with the federal requirements they obviously do not create too much smoke, which is what ellicotville claimed was their reason for denying the application.

So basically Laidlaw says hey people. If we comply with the fed guidelines which are in place, and you have no official guidelines in place, then the federal guidelines should officially become the ellicottville guidelines.

Turning down their application based on what are esentially opinion formed guidelines is a violation of federal law (at least thats what they are trying to prove, I am not saying one way or another).

Does that make sense? I hope I explained that right.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.