InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 85
Posts 237
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2009

Re: None

Monday, 08/17/2009 6:40:45 PM

Monday, August 17, 2009 6:40:45 PM

Post# of 346918
Jeff/Shelly, et al.,

Negatory.

Today's formal word was expected. Being not the referenced PR. You need bear in mind the Dicon acquisition PR. How ill-timed the release was. At the worst possible market level moment. The PR we're talking about is going to generate massive buy-side volume. Far in advance of even that which our June run-up saw on average. Is going to yield a truly massive breakout. Massive green. And recalling just how close we came to a breakout on July 27th. When management released the share structure adjustments intent PR.

Our June run-up was a different environment. Far different than today's reality. Our having talked about it all at length. At this stage of the game we're back to the true nature of the underlying venue. The sparks/catalysts/audience reality. The right spark/catalyst yielding breakout. The referenced PR to be released at some point this trading week. Massive green resulting. Word having arrived, earlier, via the grapevine. And reinforced today. Today's formal word amounting to nothing more than a prelude to that to come.

The August/September timeframe closing in. All that same means. The $4.00 plan. The MOASS. Senior listing. And it's already a matter of putting the pressure on. The very reason why the short and distort routine. Why the June run-up was targeted as it was. Certain parties feeling the heat. Pressure ever-mounting. The fundamental and operational advancement. Ever-tightening tradable float situation. The rest of it. Pressure on top of pressure.

Until all Hell does break loose!

The whole of it starting this trading week.

Waiting for it.

Kij…

Speaking volumes.

(Mr. Moskowitz)

"We believe that SpongeTech will be able to sustain the current pace that the Company is experiencing."

The "pace" of growth/expansion. Month-over-month reality. The type of sentiment having been expressed numerous times previously. And any lack of accuracy so far?

The getting of the job done.

Kelly…

The increases to 2.5b and 2.75b happened in the absence of fanfare. It being not a difficult concept. Though many among us proceed as though it were. And shock and surprise? The whole of it being in line with earlier thinking. With, now, the 900m being in the pipeline. Latest petition. To become effective. In line with latest managerial thinking.

As for lies?

Well, a challenge was presented. To one and all. With not so much as even a single response to same. Zip. Zilch. Nada. And shock and surprise? There being not so much as even a single soul among us able to point out, specifically, just where management supposedly lied.

Saying all same has to/needs to.

Wilma…

You're very welcome.

And absolutely.

The long-term success of the company depending upon it.

The $4.00 plan.

John…

(#166583)

--------------------

Jim…

We'll start with the fact that management, depending upon overall circumstance, could pursue full redress via the legal system. Via litigation. For, in effect, the parties behind the shorting abuse have committed a crime in the form of theft. Theft of company assets.

We don't have all the facts before us. And we proceed accordingly. Discussing realistic scenarios. Not pipe dreams. Not that which doesn't fit the overall goings-on. Ways in which management could proceed. Justice being served. In full.

And we know, courtesy of both IR and Mr. Moskowitz, that implementing a reverse split would lead to a change of ticker symbol. And if such were not the case? Well, would a reverse split be the answer? Justice served? In full?

Dicon came with baggage in the form of debt. The acquisition structured in a way that the parent company remained debt-free. With management not proceeding so in the absence of extremely good reason.

A need of remaining realistic. Of thinking clearly.

And while the declaration of a stock dividend might seem counterintuitive?

It isn't.

Management continues on the current path. Share structure adjustments as we know them to be. As PR'd. The setting of the stage. Demonstrating steadfast resolve in fully addressing the shorting abuse issue. Justice being fully served. Exposing the situation, in it's entirety, to all of the SEC, FINRA and the DTCC at the appropriate time. Being taken entirely seriously courtesy of having set the stage. Demonstrating serious resolve. The fiscal '09 audited detail filed. The fundamental and operational status of the issuing company made plain. For all to see. Latest detail.

Management then indicating, to the referenced entities, intent to declare the dividend. Intent to pressure involved parties/criminals to fully disgorge ill-gotten gain. Our having already addressed the associated mechanics. Complete with added pressure from all of the SEC, FINRA and the DTCC. And, very possibly, a litigation component additionally. Depending. Additional pressure.

We don't know just how management will proceed.

But the dividend scenario is entirely sound. Inclusive of the reward consideration. As opposed to dilutive. The 3:2 forward split perspective.

The SEC, FINRA and the DTCC to play a very major collective role.

Successful outcome achieved.

Pressure on top of pressure. So on.

Forcing the issue.

Stock dividend. One sound scenario of several possible.

We shall see.

--------------------
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.