you contend that "Spooz had nothing, ONCP has nothing and WRDC has nothing". Therefore, the only way a law firm will touch this is based on shareholders footing the bill.
I have several friends that are lawyers that work in various aspects of law, including computer crime. Thus I am well aware of what can be prosecuted in a court of law. Thus far Errol has made erroneous states, but not enough to go after.
As for Spooz and investors, they need to think about the PR statement connected with ONCP share structure. It indicated that Spooz insiders own 600,000,000 shares of ONCP, not that Spooz Inc owns these shares. Therefore, clarification on this matter should be addressed by those investors.
