InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 144
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2009

Re: USA*2014 post# 180

Monday, 08/17/2009 3:04:03 AM

Monday, August 17, 2009 3:04:03 AM

Post# of 116865
Accountability for 2008-12.

The $31 million tax forward didn't work out so well did it? You will find no mention of it in Edgar. In a normal environment, those carry forward losses would have been worth as much as the current Treaty market cap. It's funny too because both ARGY and Treaty are in the same business, scalping investors over fantastical sure-to-fail energy producing schemes. So why not carry the loss forward? Of course it' a moot point because Treaty has its own immunity from the income tax.

Hey what's that about Treaty "making money"? Did you make that up on your own or did Mulshine tell you they were making money? Because they weren't making money. Have you ever given any thought to correcting the processes that ended up with you posting that Treaty was making money when they obviously were not?

It's important to learn from mistakes and this is a big one here. So FMI was this your own personal speculation that Treaty would be able to carry forward the ARGY losses, or did Mulshine tell you that? Or that they were making money. Because one of you has been shown to be unreliable. Or both.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.