NVE Corporation (NVEC)

[BUDDIEE18]

hello ?? found these posts, dated 2006...of some interest?

R
August 29, 2006 12:09 PM
NVEC, NVE Corp, engineers and PHD's with MRAM patents and sensors could be large one day, heavily shorted a year ago, now having positive revenue growth in the medical fields and sensor markets.

R
August 29, 2006 1:45 PM
A little more NVEC, it is good DD.
http://www.nve.com

"NVEC the company, compared to most other nanotech valuation, should be worth about $1BN.

That brings the PPS around $225.

homework on NVE/FSL MRAM-MTJ-

the "toggle" is a "Method for switching the bit cells"

Dr. Daughton presented this paper- on an "optimized" toggle which was even better than the toggle FSL employed
http://www.nve.com/Downloads/49MMM-Optim...

I even asked Dr. Baker where the 16Mb, MRAM cell was fabricated/came from- got "no comment"-

the Basics of an MTJ- specifically a 1T/1MTJ cell is NVE's IP, the method of switching does NOT change the makeup of the basic Cell- When FSL fabricates a MRAM cell with a 1T/1MTJ, there are infringing on NVE's IP regardless of the type of method they utilize to "switch the cell"

Also If you not the specific design of the MTJ cell by NVE with it's components here-http://nve.com/Downloads/Boston_MRS_2004...

see pages 4 and 16

comparedwith page 3 of the FSL document
http://www.freescale.com/files/technolog...

and here

http://www.freescale.com/files/memory/do...

are NVE's IP

, all this stuff has been hashed and rehashed-


and really doubt you were not aware of this
NVE makes the Motor and FSL makes the blower, take away the blower and you still have an engine, take away the engine and the blower is useless.


NVE actually has positive earnings .

All other nanotech firms I referenced were in the LUX Nanotech Index and only 3 had positive earnings. They had valuation in the $BNs.

Most of the other ones had valuations way higher than NVE with negative earnings and no products in sight. "

R
August 29, 2006 1:47 PM
4.5mm shares total
"NVEC the company, compared to most other nanotech valuation, should be worth about $1BN.

That brings the PPS around $225.

homework on NVE/FSL MRAM-MTJ-

the "toggle" is a "Method for switching the bit cells"

Dr. Daughton presented this paper- on an "optimized" toggle which was even better than the toggle FSL employed
http://www.nve.com/Downloads/49MMM-Optim...

I even asked Dr. Baker where the 16Mb, MRAM cell was fabricated/came from- got "no comment"-

the Basics of an MTJ- specifically a 1T/1MTJ cell is NVE's IP, the method of switching does NOT change the makeup of the basic Cell- When FSL fabricates a MRAM cell with a 1T/1MTJ, there are infringing on NVE's IP regardless of the type of method they utilize to "switch the cell"

Also If you not the specific design of the MTJ cell by NVE with it's components here-http://nve.com/Downloads/Boston_MRS_2004...

see pages 4 and 16

comparedwith page 3 of the FSL document
http://www.freescale.com/files/technolog...

and here

http://www.freescale.com/files/memory/do...

are NVE's IP

, all this stuff has been hashed and rehashed-


and really doubt you were not aware of this
NVE makes the Motor and FSL makes the blower, take away the blower and you still have an engine, take away the engine and the blower is useless.


NVE actually has positive earnings .
All other nanotech firms I referenced were in the LUX Nanotech Index and only 3 had positive earnings. They had valuation in the $BNs.

Most of the other ones had valuations way higher than NVE with negative earnings and no products in sight. "


http://www.nve.com