InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 14045
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/27/2008

Re: temp luvs amy post# 1056

Friday, 08/14/2009 1:13:46 AM

Friday, August 14, 2009 1:13:46 AM

Post# of 1142
Agree.

The issues with expecting change from the pattern in EBHIQ management behavior ? If they DO as you suggest is possible, and put value back into the shares after saying there wasn't a chance that would happen ? I think it is not just an issue of exposing themselves to shareholder liability, but that it seems unlikely that they would alter the course and the pattern in their behavior without having done so in coordination with others for purpose... to enable a benefit from doing so... ie, with a purpose to enable profits from insider trading.

What they have done thus far is repugnant and unethical, and I would say, borders on the criminal... certainly seems to have potential, at least, for civil legal action were shareholder to decide to act, but, it will not matter if the shareholders do nothing about it. If they do as you suggest they might... I think they will be looking at an entirely different set of challenges... with risks that won't depend on shareholders acting.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.