Drinks Americas Holdings, Ltd. (DKAM)

[BCInvestor]

Well I am glad you asked that question.

I researched and found the following total number of cases vs LIQR:

2 cases American Arbitration Association - 1 vs DKAM, 1 from old owner of company in 2005 over a $10,000 discrepency.

3 cases in Florida court: 1 vs old owner over a $13,000 discrepency, 1 vs company that LIQR purchased (disclosed in multiple filings and nothing to do with LIQR operations) and one that was just settled as disclosed in filings as well without the need for an attorney related to an importer.

1 case in Federal Court: 2006 Happy Vodka trademark proceeding, Liquor Group was named as co-defendant to Happy Vodka Corporation. Happy Vodka Corporation won the case and the Federal Appeal, and Liquor Group was wholly vindicated.

Far less than the 20 you claim. Once again the Facts do not help your cause.

Now look at DKAM:

State of California Board of Equity vs DKAM - active case - DKAM did not even show up for court and just had a judgment scheduled. DKAM fails to pay it's workers.

VINLUX vs DKAM - active case - DKAM fails to pay it's bills with distributor.

Southern Wine & Spirits West vs DKAM - actve case - DKAM fails to pay it's bills with distributor.

LIQR vs DKAM - active case - DKAM fails to pay it's bills with distributor.

Do you see a pattern here...I sure do.