While I agree that doctors may have to go through a learning curve to pin down how it can be effectively used, and many people in general hate to learn new things, I could think of situations where doctors could love it. For example, for years my doctor had been after me to do a colonoscopy as I had reached the age when standard medical practice calls for this exam, and for years I had put it off as I like most people had been lax in even getting the standard annual physical. So my doctor would do stool sample cards, and then digital exams and brushing the digital on a stool blood test card to "prove" that there was blood requiring the colonoscopy, but the test card came out negative until last year when the digital exam was performed real "hard" resulting in the test card showing some blood detection, and the doctor made the hard sell that something real bad may be happening in my colon, and I gave in to the colonoscopy exam, which came out without any polyp nor cancer tumor detection. Now with the theoretical positive RECAF test, doctors would just put people through the standard set of exams that most people put off like chest X-rays, colonoscopy, mamogram, check for weight lost, unusual pain, general poor appearances, family history of cancers etc. Most of these standards for checking for cancer already exist as large unexplained weight lost need to rule out cancers, and new standards can be set up by the medical establishment on what tests to make. There are also more specific markers. Full CAT scan is another step. If RECAF Velocity is verified as effective with further research, such calculations can refine the test data interpretation. Currently unexplained heavy weight lost, unexplained coughing, unexplained pain and such would already call for examination for cancer. Nothing unusual about people needing to do physicals that people usually skip. However, it is hard for the medical establishment to adopt new ways whether technically justified or not, IMO. That is the reality. No technology is perfect, but these imperfect technology is used by smartly using them. Just like people waiting for the perfect spouse, they wait forever. If technology needed to be used, the technology has to be used with their imperfections. No big deal. The big deal often is trying to get people and doctors to change.
