Gold stated,
"Sorry half, the PSA test picks up tons of them. Are you wishing RECAF to be less sensitive than PSA? Another counter to your argument."
I was not even speaking of the PSA test.
You keep stating that Recaf picks up on the "Slow growing cancers" and state that as a potential flaw.
I see it as a positive for Recaf (IF IT DOES PICK UP the slow growing cancers. because, " This assumes that the prostate tumor is slow growing. Indeed, such tumors are generally slow growing, but for reasons not understood at this time, some tumors will quickly become quite rapidly growing."
So if they become "Rapidly growing" your argument is that that is when they are dangerous cancers.
So if Recaf picks slow growing cancers I win! If it waits and picks them up when they become fast growing cancers I WIN!
WIN WIN for Half Full
Lose Lose for Gseeker.
