InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 389
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/12/2009

Re: cjgaddy post# 39870

Thursday, 08/06/2009 8:22:59 PM

Thursday, August 06, 2009 8:22:59 PM

Post# of 345969
Thanks CJ and thanks for all the effort you and KT put into this site.

That explains my confusion with that article and its June 14 date and not being in this August issue.

However, I'm not all that disappointed. Based on Nature Medicine chief editor's response to my email (the one I posted yesterday) its not uncommon at all for a paper to take up to 10 to 12 months to work through the peer review process and get published. Also, based on other examples of time lines for publishing papers in Nature journals (provided by someone on this board yesterday or earlier today) it would seem that the next 2 months are probably the sweet spot for time required for getting papers published in Nature.

It will be a huge disappointment to me if we don't get this information made public in time to get whatever positive effect it may have for stock price increase prior to the October deadline and we don't have anything else ready to publish to boost price.

I realize PPHM management has absolutely zero control over the Haynes article in Nature Medicine but I will be judging them on whatever other contingency plans they may have to boost this stock price to get us out from under this de-listing issue. However, I'm quite aware that lacking 50.1 % stock ownership my opinion is worthless.

I agree with a number of the others whose intuition (gained from acute observation of this stock and the associated news over an extended period of time) that there is a very positive news event that will occur very soon, but the reality is we just don't know - at least I don't.

I wish BOT would provide another morale boost.

What a poker game this turning into. You gotta love it :)
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News