InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 13381
Next 10
Followers 434
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: PanicButton post# 4969

Thursday, 08/06/2009 3:32:11 PM

Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:32:11 PM

Post# of 13381
lol .. i know .. i was seriously lol

you know .. how about a little common sense
and logic gets applied ..

legal shorting is necessary .. so implement
sen. kaufman's suggestion of a unique id for
a batch of shares legally borrowed against
but have it computerized so they are *visible*
or *transparent* for all to see .. no dark holes

secondly .. never allow *shorting* on any co.
whose pps falls below X .. that could be 1.00
or .50 cents .. this would allow those new co.s
with non street savvy ceo's to not be *deliberately
destroyed* before they can actually get off their
knees ..

which brings me to my third point ..

change the regs on sarbox to a sliding scale on
the costs .. so that the one size fits all
policy
that is so swell for msft .. doesn't
annihilate small and micros .. truly crippling
for those coming public .. we've lost a decade

and lastly .. make every co. on the pinks have
to *file* some basic aspects .. that would include
share structure .. cd's and the like .. on an annual
basis or even every 6 months .. if they don't they
can't *trade* ..

not every co. that comes public on the otc/otc bb
is a scam .. but most are preyed upon as tho'
they are


but without the ability to *legally short* a new co.
there will be no Naked shorting .. which will solve
that little .. issue .. regardless of where it's done
and by *whom*

--
4kids
all jmo

10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.