Thanks, but I'm not criticizing you for being positive - I think on balance you've been very objective and fair, not only in your posting but as mod.
I also agree that scams are worse than investments that simply go bad, but I do think that people are generally better able to spot a scam more easily than a very risky investment. I also find that in most cases, there are more people posting warnings about scam stocks than about those with bad balance sheets and overvalued based on future expectations with little regard for either past performance or what it takes to achieve those future expectations, which of course is far more than an honest and capable management.
I am also not as trustful or forgiving of those who attempt to convince others to buy a stock using an anonymous MB when they clearly are not either buying themselves or making the same recommendations to their friends and families. Clearly we'll have to agree to disagree about who that covers, but I think it's fair to say I am far more skeptical of people's motives than you (very un-Tolle like, to be sure).
Again, thanks for your support and thanks for your objectivity, you are truly the rarest of mods in my ihub experience.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
GEORGE SANTAYANA
