InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 185
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2009

Re: None

Tuesday, 08/04/2009 7:46:23 PM

Tuesday, August 04, 2009 7:46:23 PM

Post# of 346927
I cannot BELIEVE we are still talking about these forged documents. Somehow, I feel privileged to see such absurdity going on in a supposedly serious forum. Really brings a lot of color to the technical aspect of trading.

Get over it. The documents are false, their claims are false, and the implications are circular.

Let's get back to basics.

A few weeks ago I posted that this stock really comes down to the question, "What are management's intents and motivations with Spongetech?" Bears say management is diluting. Bulls say that the pps has been effected by manipulations (i.e. excessive shorting).

Now the question I hope everyone asks themselves - "which one of the above scenarios actually has legitimate, verifiable proof from an unbiased source?"

1. Bears/bashers have documents that are at best very shady, and at worst forged to support dilution/management mal-intent.

2. Bulls have SPNG's listing on the SEC's official Reg SHO list to support manipulation, and a successful management business plan to support management integrity.

Get it through your heads. Management is not ripping anyone off. Let's debate the merits of the pps, whether it is overpriced or underpriced. And honestly, to all of you paid bashers (we know you're there), why don't you give up a fairly disgusting lifestyle (in my opinion), buy some SPNG shares, and come out ahead in a way that maintains your integrity?

*cough* IMO *cough*

FM4E

"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good."
- Samuel Johnson

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.