Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[zakrosian]

There is a clear choice, if you want our young soldiers dying in far away fields for the next 20 years, chose Bush, if you want direct surgical removal of terrorist nest, chose Kerry.

I'd love an excuse to vote against Bush, but what has Kerry done or said over the past couple months that would make you think he's even remotely capable of devising and implementing a strategy for a "surgical removal of terrorist nest". I've seen some pretty inept presidential campaigns over the years - Dukakis in '88, Bush in '92, and Gore in 2000, but Kerry is making them look good. If, despite the millions in 527 spending on his behalf and the active support of the mainstream media, he can't handle Karl Rove, then how is he going to be able to manage an intelligent campaign against the Islamic terrorists?