DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[mingwan0]

Frog, yes a masterpiece of logic based on a set of assumptions that are not at all tenuous or biased! To be fair, this line of reasoning occurred to me the first time I saw the event description. However, there are alternative explanations. For instance, Dr. Kondragunta's Attorney could have made a Motion to Withdraw as Plaintiff's Attorney for any number of valid reasons; or perhaps based on the fact that they did not think Dr. Kondragunta had a hope in hell of successfully defending the action or winning his countersuit, and therefore any renumeration based on a split of damages awarded to him would not be forthcoming - ample reason for any Attorney to cobble together grounds for a Motion to Withdraw and for a competent judge to throw said motion out. Then again, that is just speculation on my part of course.

In regards to a later response, pertaining to the reason the lawsuit was originally brought by DNAP, I contend that preventing posts to RB was not the primary motive. Rather, as you might recall from the Court documents which were viewable over the Internet at the time, the motivation related to actual or potential disclosure of company confidential information to third parties.

I am not sure if we will even see a full explanation of events at the point that the case is concluded, unless of course one of the Sarasota residents physically goes to the Courthouse to examine the details in situ...