InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 1815
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2008

Re: BigGreen101 post# 14351

Saturday, 08/01/2009 4:03:42 PM

Saturday, August 01, 2009 4:03:42 PM

Post# of 16405
You make excellent points, and your time frame may not be off-based. With respect to NFA, below are some various quick links:

NFA Search: http://www.nfa.futures.org/BasicNet/
141 Capital: http://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/SearchResults.aspx?type=firm&firm=141
Spooz: http://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/SearchResults.aspx?type=firm&firm=SPOOZ
STRICKLAND,PAUL: http://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/SearchResults.aspx?type=indv&lname=STRICKLAND&fname=PAUL
STONE,ERROL: http://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/SearchResults.aspx?type=indv&lname=STONE&fname=ERROL

I would also add to the already existing list, Spooz, SPZI the siamese twin that spawned 141 Capital, ONCP. SPZI holds a considerable number of shares of ONCP, and at present the viability of SPZI remains in question. When management decided to create 141 Capital, a number of existing shareholders of Spooz supported this decision and invested in 141 Capital. For some of the newer shareholders, who are trading simply on techinical analysis this point may be missed entirely, along with the frustration of the longs who have supported both endevours. Unless the situation with SPZI is corrected, it could potentially create problems for ONCP as the management of ONCP is the same as SPZI.

In the interim, those who are trading on the price per share gyrations of ONCP as a result of trading on technical analysis, I can only say to you,
"Good Luck With That!"

Just my opinion of course.

funmaxus

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.