InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: bag8ger post# 17279

Friday, 09/10/2004 4:24:14 PM

Friday, September 10, 2004 4:24:14 PM

Post# of 82595
bag,

Fair enough. Just idle speculation that came out sounding like established fact.

I have no idea what any of the secondary considerations were that drove DNAP to their litigation. The prime motive however was obviously to get him off the RB board as quickly as possible. His knowledge of the sordid details in regards to the compensation packages together with his dismay at the betrayal he felt for being left out, made him a dangerous voice talking to investors. He needed to be silenced quickly.