Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[jim6103]

Response from the company:

After quickly reading the National Instrument when it came out, I had many great surprises and one nagging doubt. My doubt now has been washed away through Merle's concise and appropriate answer to my query as found below. More on the report tomorrow when I have more time... Suffice it to say that "it really is all good now"....Bank on it...Jim

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:54:13 -0700 "Merle Goertz" <[e-mail]> writes:

Jim,

The calculation you refer to was not done by Alan and is what we have from our 43-101 compliant report as highlighted in the news release.

In response to:

"Dear Scott,

I have just now finished reading the entire report. The results are phenomenal and really beyond what I had expected from the Hawke Zone. After reading the report, I did not get the impression that Alan's block model from the D Zone drilling was converted to a National Instrument standard resource. The PR from the company before the report stated the "indicated" and "inferred" resource data that was referenced in the report, but there was no conclusion by the author stating that a compliant resource by his judgement is present. The last sentence of the below paragraph is confusing:

"Further drilling in this area as a part of the recommendations from this report will assist in bringing the full historic resource up to NI 43-101 standards."

Does this mean that the resource outlined by Alan is in compliance with NI standards and just the remainder of the resource not as yet measured needs to be brought up to standards or the entire Hawke Zone needs further drilling to get up to NI standards?

The stock holders need a verification of the report and a conclusive statement of what the company has in the way of a compliant resource, if any."