InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 360
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/08/2008

Re: CTTC post# 46626

Tuesday, 07/28/2009 6:55:32 AM

Tuesday, July 28, 2009 6:55:32 AM

Post# of 103302
Surely this did not come as a surprise to anyone. If it was, then you are in for more surprises IMO. There is a big difference between having an agreement to purchase power and a PUC approved contract to purchase power. Which is something Laidlaw does not appear to have and as a result of this, is unlikely to get IMO. And without a PUC approved contract to sell power to PSNH, it makes the odds of Laidlaw submitting an application to SEC about as good as the likelihood of the pulp mill returning to Berlin. IMO.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.