Any statement that requires a disclaimer is at least partially false, or intended to mislead. Otherwise, you wouldn't need the disclaimer, would you?
It's patently absurd, in my opinion, to believe anyone who continues to claim that the OS is decreasing here, in view of the recent volume and price action. Especially when all it would take to verify those claims would be to ungag the TA. These insiders are OBVIOUSLY lying. Right in everybody's faces.
And while we're on the subject, has anybody ever looked into the share structure here with regard to control stock? What percentage of the control of this company are represented by these common shares? Any? Or is the share structure set up in such a way that the preferreds are undilutable while the commons are not? That's the usual scheme going on in these paper mills.
A good bottom's hard to beat.
e
