InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 10321
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 06/30/2004

Re: clawmann post# 180692

Friday, 07/24/2009 6:42:31 AM

Friday, July 24, 2009 6:42:31 AM

Post# of 326338
clawmann, thank you for the info ...

... and for digging it up w/analysis.

"For purposes of Regulation FD, a posting on a blog, by or on behalf of the company, would be treated the same as any other posting on a company's web site. The company would have to consider the factors outlined above to determine if the blog posting could be considered 'public.'"

Bena isn't quite a blog 'by or on behalf of' NeoMedia. She covers other companies/events/etc ... some of which might not even have to pay her LOL.

Now, if NEOM wants to put a link on NEOM's website saying 'here is Bena's blog and she is one of our news outlets, check there first for breaking news and updates, we'll get it on our website eventually too' then they might be okay.

Right now it's in a major gray area and IMHO is just one more instance of loose lips flapping around NEOM.

Thanks again.

jonesie

p.s. Wow, arpvrp and hiijacker's posts about Bena saying something like she isn't going to talk about Scanbuy if somebody doesn't pay her, and deleting comments re: Scanbuy .... that is just amazing. NEOM/Bena just got into an even grayer area IMO. No surprise, business as usual as I posted the other day.

Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"